VCs have a much higher chance of making good money. Their own investors (“LPs” or Limited Partners) pay them for a decade more than fairly to manage their investments, no matter how well or poorly they perform.
But — truly great founders make the most by far. By far.
Let’s use a “fun” example in Zoom. As I type this, Zoom is worth $40 billion.
And here was the cap table at IPO:
Roughly, this means the largest VC firm, Emergence, has a $5 billion stake (wow!). And Sequoia is close at $4.5 billion.
Eric Yuan, CEO (a very modest CEO who really doesn’t care), however, is worth 22% x $40b = $8.8 billion.
But it’s more subtle than that. The VC partners don’t get to keep it all themselves.
Let’s break down a $5 billion stake for a VC firm — an incredible stake:
- LPs (the VCs’ own investors) keep 80% of the value of the investment: $4b. (Sometimes 70%-75%, but doesn’t matter too much for this point).
- This leaves the VCs themselves 20% ($1b) to split up. Now, let’s assume 4 partners split 80% of the $1b, and 20% goes to everyone else at the fund. And let’s assume the partners are truly equal (which is rare).
- Then here, each VC firm partner makes $1b x .80 x .25 or $200m. An insane amount, yet. But …
As crazy as an individual VC making $200m from Zoom is, the CEO on paper makes 44x more.
And working much, much harder. Working 80 hours a week, for a decade, sweating it every day, taking insane risk in the early days. Bearing the burden to hit every quarter, every year, forever. That’s a lot harder than writing a check and coming to a few board meetings.
And yes, VCs get to make dozens of bets. And take great ski vacations and even the summers off, sort of, some times. CEOs never really get much of a break. And if VCs bet really well, they still can get mighty rich over time.
But only 1/44th as rich as a truly great founder in this example. And VCs aren’t the founders. They aren’t the ones that did it. They just helped.
Which would you rather be? It’s not really mostly about money for the best of us.