Let me give a higher-level learning.

Ultimately, most (not all, but most) VCs have to invest in the Best Companies They Can.

Because there’s a clock.

Most VC funds want to finish their primary investments, their first checks into new companies — within about 36 months, sometimes less.  (Those funds will keep writing checks into existing investments for another 7-10 years after that).

Back into that, most VC partners need to do from 1-3 investments a year, with perhaps an average of 2 per year.

That means … at the end of the day … each year, they have to invest in the Best One or Two Companies that (x) they meet (y) that fits their stage / model, AND (z) that will take their money.

The better the deal flow, the better the companies you see that will take your money — the reality is, the evaluation changes.  Even if the criteria are seemingly similar.  If you got to meet Uber, Zenefits, AirBnb, Stripe, etc. and pick from them — that’s one thing.  Most VCs don’t.

Most VCs only see a handful of truly great start-ups a year.  And most VCs can’t get into the best deals / win deals.

So the real truth is, most VCs are playing against the clock.  They invest in the best they can in the time they have.

See Questions On Quora

View original question on quora

Related Posts

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This